A New Hope for Palestine
Only two years ago, the possibility of a democratically-elected Palestinian leader seemed not just untenable but downright risible.
Only two years ago, the possibility of a democratically-elected Palestinian leader seemed not just untenable but downright risible.
To the Editor: A comment regarding the headline "TDX party collects $1,200 for tsunami victims," from Jan.
To the Editor: The most disingenuous aspect of the controversy surrounding Karl Furstenberg's letter to Alfred Bloom, President of Swarthmore College, is Dean Furstenberg's contention that his letter was a "private," "personal letter" to "a friend." Clearly, it was nothing of the kind. The letter, a carefully crafted, closely argued missive on Dartmouth College letterhead paper, was not a confidential message between old friends.
In their twilight years, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams debated the global significance of the American Revolution.
To the Editor: The Dartmouth Editorial Board ("Verbum Ultimum," Jan. 7) poses the question: is a mediocre football team a reasonable trade-off for a stronger academic environment? My answer is "no." We should expect excellence and a competitive effort in both arenas.
It's difficult to capture the magnitude of the Asian tsunami disaster with words. For that, it takes pictures. Picture the faces of the hungry, the tired, the sad and the desperate -- dirty yet blanched, fixed in masks of pain or resignation. Picture the arms, reaching out, straining to grab food and water as hundreds mob the precious aid stations. Picture overhead satellite photos of huts and homes, green plains and sandy beaches, farms and roads. Picture the strange order and calm of the "before" shots. Then picture the "after" shots, the absence of life, the landscapes and cityscapes reduced to carpets of mud and rubble. Picture the impossible force of the waves: boats thrown miles inland from any place boats ought to be, trains ripped from the tracks and left on top of crushed homes, cars and buses overturned and scattered like so much driftwood on a beach. Then picture the "fortunate" survivors, left to pick through these alien scenes, searching for lost homes, lost livelihoods and lost loved ones. Picture all the hurricanes, tornadoes and floods of recent memory, add them up and then start to multiply. Picture a dozen tiny mushroom clouds. Picture a genocide of nature's own making, the product not of malice but of the capriciousness of chance. Then picture it all as only the iceberg-tip of disaster, with famine and diseases to follow that may eclipse the initial suffering. Picture all that, and slowly the magnitude of the loss comes into focus. The task now facing the international community, if the tide of suffering is to be turned, is of equal size and weight. The world is called by humanitarian imperative, but the crisis at hand is so large as to seem nearly insurmountable.
It's winter in Hanover again, and for all of us trapped in the tumultuous midsection of our D-Plans, this means any of our more prudent, fortunate and survival-minded friends are gone.
When John Lyons was fired as head football coach and Buddy Teevens was simultaneously let go from Stanford, I was fairly certain of the abilities of the Dartmouth administrative forces to screw things up.
To the Editor: In her Jan. 5 letter, Mary Anna Sullivan '76 was concerned that the College might "revert to the Dartmouth of the '70s." This concern was voiced in a letter supporting Dean Furstenberg's right to voice a personal opinion, whether that opinion ran counter to the philosophies of the Board of Trustees or, for that matter, the majority of the alums.
With many alumni calling for Dean of Admissions Karl Furstenberg's head after the unearthing of a letter he wrote to Swarthmore President Albert Bloom in 2000, controversy has erupted over the appropriateness of Furstenberg's comments and the impact his expressed views have had on Dartmouth athletics.
To the Editor: Responding to Bryan Knutson ("The Last Straw," Jan. 6): good riddance, you whining, mudslinging child. The dean's letter was private, from one individual to another.
To the Editor: I disagree with Louis Odette's letter to the editor ("Safety at What Cost?" Jan.
To The Editor: I have recently resigned as President of the Dartmouth Alumni Club out here in Seattle.
I have always wondered what it is with Muslims, oil, civil unrest and, at this point in time, natural disasters.
To The Editor: I write in support of Dean Furstenberg. His remarks -- now four years old -- represent his personal beliefs about the mission of an excellent liberal arts college.
To The Editor: Dean Furstenberg is under attack for comments he made in private to another college administrator.
The past weeks were an idyllic scene, full of smiling families and festivity. Christmas lights bathed everything in a soft, electric glow which tinged hearts with good cheer. "What a lovely holiday season," the American People sighed contentedly, and they settled down to watch reruns of "It's a Wonderful Life." But somewhere in between the Christmas ham and the New Year's champagne, our joy and warmth was, quite literally, washed away. Like the rest of the world community, I too was shocked and horrified at the disaster that claimed more than 150,000 lives, a number which I'm sure will continue to increase.
To The Editor: I was very disappointed, but not entirely surprised, by the news regarding Dean Furstenberg's comments regarding football, and athletics in general.
Two month after the election, much of the grassroots energy that brought a supposedly unelectable liberal within one state of beating a wartime Republican incumbent has dissipated.
To The Editor: In response to Brent Porter's article in the Nov. 23 edition, first let me express my deepest condolences to his daughter and his family.