A Dip in the Legal System
The sentence handed down last week to Mohammad Usman, a former member of the class of 2010, left us concerned that Usman's crime was answered with little more than a slap on the wrist.
The sentence handed down last week to Mohammad Usman, a former member of the class of 2010, left us concerned that Usman's crime was answered with little more than a slap on the wrist.
My perfect picture of sophomore summer has slowly begun to slip away. I once dreamt of sunny days, little to no workload and a smaller student body on campus.
Since our new president's introduction in March, Jim Yong Kim has repeatedly referred to former College President John Sloan Dickey as a great model even likening himself to the former President during his first address to the College.
My basic plea for you, (newly inaugurated) President Kim, is to devote your first months in office to getting to know Dartmouth. The College will do well following the trajectory that President Wright set it on, at least for the foreseeable future, so you can keep his policies for now. Dartmouth, as an institution, is strong because of the people that love it so much.
The presidential transition provides a rare opportunity to reexamine the College. What swift steps can College President Kim take to enhance Dartmouth's greatest strengths and address its most glaring weaknesses? When President Kim begins his term he will be bombarded with requests from a number of departments hoping to make their concerns Kim's first priority.
We really need to have a talk about this Twitter thing. I don't have a problem with the concept, but something has gone terribly wrong if CNN has started to think that Twitter is a substitute for hard reporting.
A recently posted YouTube video shows church members in southern Connecticut performing an exorcism on a 16-year-old boy in order to remove the "homosexual demons" from his body.
As enchanting as they find themselves, politicians are a maddeningly unreflective breed.
Dear Dartmouth, I know we've had our rough times together, but I'm back for the summer. I want to make things right.
Surprisingly, there has been very little written about the end of the era that we are now witnessing.
That the Republican Party would strongly oppose U.S. Circuit Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court is not at all surprising.
Friday's Verbum Ultimum discussed the proposed changes to the procedures and structure of the Organizational Adjudication Committee. Do you believe these changes are appropriate, and if so, why?
I'm tired of having this debate. I received a blitz the other day: "Yeah, let's talk about it over lunch.
The reforms proposed by the Organizational Adjudication Committee Review Commission represent a positive step toward more consistent and just treatment of student organizations ("SA endorses OAC reform proposal," May 27). Whereas, under the current system, all but the most serious cases are often heard by a single dean, the commission's proposal calls for students to take the lead in making decisions in all cases thus allowing for true peer adjudication, fairness and, ideally, transparency. Under the proposed system, organizations accused of violations appear before a board composed of five students selected from a larger pool of 45 student adjudicators.
According to a recent New York Times article, the rate at which teenagers are currently sending and receiving text messages is higher than ever.
To the Editor: Regarding the Editorial Board's recent piece ("Let's Put it to a Vote," May 22), one guesses that there will not be another election for alumni trustees until a full year from now.
One of my favorite poets is Jalaludin Rumi, a medieval Islamic scholar, Sufi mystic, jurist and, by most accounts, good dancer, who lived in 13th century Turkey.
To the Editor: According to members of Student Assembly, Dartmouth Dining Services' policies prevent Greek houses from advertising their events on Food Court televisions, not as I incorrectly assumed my column yesterday the Assembly ("Don't Hate the Greeks," May 27). Assuming it was Student Assembly's decision was rash and unfair. The issue of anti-Greek discrimination still merits examination.
I am perplexed. How can it be that someone is a "better" Republican than someone else? I never knew one's commitment to his or her political party could be measured, let alone ranked.
Student Assembly recently made one of the best decisions of its history: it decided to make use of the Food Court TVs by offering student groups a chance to advertise their events in high definition.