The Corruption of Politics
To the Editor: The Easter season recalls the ancient story of a public official who permitted capital punishment of a man he knew to be innocent.
To the Editor: The Easter season recalls the ancient story of a public official who permitted capital punishment of a man he knew to be innocent.
All right, sure, I really don't know anything about the following subject. But what does that really matter?
You know, when my younger brother first came into my four-year old world, I didn't care what Mom and Dad said about loving him.
Has anyone else been wondering who the graduation speaker is going to be this June? Isn't it about time we found out?
Have you ever noticed that all words are defined by other words? There is not a single word in any language whose meaning can be expressed without the deployment of other words that are subject to the very same linguistic limitation.
Once again, the radical and anti-intellectual movement here at the College has reared its ugly head in the form of a new faction of the Dartmouth Rainbow Alliance that ironically labels itself with a self-demeaning title, the "Political Queers." This group's agenda is not only in direct contradiction with their most fundamental goals of integrating the Dartmouth Community and promoting campus-wide tolerance of the gay/lesbian community, but their proposal to obtain affinity housing for gay/lesbian students is both socially and intellectually destructive to the well being of our campus. The beauty of Dartmouth's current housing policy is that from the start, an attempt is made to integrate first-year students with as diverse a group of upper-class students as possible.
Dartmouth is changing. The student body as a whole is recognizing the undercurrents tugging at the community and we are facing up to the challenge of pulling together on individual and group levels.
To the Editor: I realized my mistake yesterday concerning Robert Lendvai's article [April 3,] after reading John Strayer's rebuttal [April 4,] the following day. I can only point out that Lendvai's article is a poor example of the "classic slippery slope" that he must have intended and a perfect example of a straight and sudden drop. The last several paragraphs are, I assume, supposed to be the satirical revelation of his article. The extremist points Lendvai includes in his last comments are his entire argument; however, they are not mentioned anywhere in the previous paragraphs, thus making his attempt at satire asymmetrical and unparallel. Satire should be developed carefully throughout a piece, not hastily tacked onto the end.
To the Editor: As the Volunteer Coordinator of Dartmouth Community Services at the Tucker Foundation, I would like to resond to Adam Siegel's letter [April 5, ] concerning the Multicultural Project. First, I want to correct several errors he made in representing the program.
There are few phrases more abused today in the English language than the line in the constitution which goes "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal." These words, born of the desire to secure for the citizens of the new nation of America freedoms which had been lacking in the Old World, have today been pressed into the service of all those who would seek to subvert those freedoms. Who are those of whom I speak?
In a boomtown, money flows like a raging river. During the 1880s, young entrepreneurs flocked west to legendary boomtown destinations like Tombstone, Arizona.
To the Editor: Full Fare: without a doubt the best eating establishment on campus. With the best food, (none of that non-meat meat substitute like Collis), the best seating, (no crossbars on the tables that you hit your shins on like at the Hop and none of the noise or confusion of Food Court), great conversation, and that special Full Fare ambiance, it outshines the rest by far.
To The Editor: It is so ironic that liberals are often the most intolerant people around. Robert Lendvai's diatribe against free speech ["Limit Free Speech," The Dartmouth, April 3] was the best proof of this phenomenon I've seen in a long time.
To The Editor: I recently received a blitz from the "Multicultural Project," an organization created by the Tucker Foundation in conjunction with several local elementary schools, which is apparently seeking to "expose area public school students to cultural education which they might not be exposed to." Hoping to recruit student volunteers, I was asked if I would be interested in participating in this program.
To the Editor: I must say, shock only begins to describe how I felt today, when I walked down that ramp in the Hopkins Center and saw that the bust of Warner Bentley had been replaced with a Polaroid picture.
So I read in yesterday's paper some freshman wants to suspend me from writing for The Dartmouth. As I looked closer at his column I realized he is satirizing the notion of speech codes.
We're seeing a longer, more drawn out Student Assembly campaign this year. This is due to new rule changes that have largely scrapped the designated campaign period those of us who have watched these elections before are used to.
So what's up with housing at Dartmouth? Can I say that the deadline for signing up for housing is approaching rapidly?
The College's decision not to institute a speech code is the result of a misguided liberalism that endangers the welfare of the college community. While free speech has its virtues, those virtues must be weighed against the numerous disadvantages that the doctrine engenders.
To the Editor: There was an incident that took place Thursday Feb 23 involving a physical altercation between two female students (a third student was present) at approximately 9:30 p.m.