Pornography misrepresents women's sexuality
To the Editor: The "dilemma" which Matt Nisbet points out in feminist discourse on pornography ("Playboy Opponents Face a Long Fight," April 13, 1995) is actually old news.
To the Editor: The "dilemma" which Matt Nisbet points out in feminist discourse on pornography ("Playboy Opponents Face a Long Fight," April 13, 1995) is actually old news.
Pascalwrote, "Plurality which is not reduced to unity is confusion; unity which does not depend on plurality is tyranny." The tension between plurality and unity lies at the center of Dartmouth's multiculturalism debate.
To the Editor: Debbie Carbonaro '97 seems to think that Playboy "is contributing to an industry whose sole purpose is the sale of women's bodies," ("The Importance of Rejecting Playboy," April 12, 1995.) She fails to see other points, firstly, that every woman that has been a centerfold in the recent past has received large amounts of cash and has had many doors opened [to] the fashion and entertainment industries. She states that "it seems extremely difficult to view a woman as a commodity one day and then go to work or school the next day and treat her as an equal." Perhaps she might not see this as good because these women are relying on their bodies as opposed to their intellects in such situations to succeed.
Matt Nisbet's column "Just Right of the Center" ("Playboy Opponents Face a Long Fight," April 13, 1995) should have been more appropriately titled, "Just Right Passed the Point." In a stupendous display of logical analysis Nisbet leads us to the quintessential Dartmouth view, "Is it worth the trouble?" I do not intend to try to explain the difference between art and pornography, which any intelligent person could discern for himself.
Itis official: The Commencement exercises for the Class of 1995 will take place on Memorial Field instead of in front of Baker Library.
To the Editor: The Class of '95 has earned a wonderful distinction. We will be the first class whose Commencement exercises will be held in Memorial Stadium, breaking the 40-year-old tradition of commencement in front of Baker Library.
Isat down to lunch last week with a fierycampus feminist and asked her whether she was in support of Playboy magazine's "Women of the Ivy League" issue.
SinceI have been a student here, one of the biggest question marks of the campus has surrounded the future of Greek system.
To the Editor I have many reservations about holding Commencement at Memorial Field. It is my feeling that commencement should be held at Baker's Grand Lawn. First and foremost, I believe that holding Commencement at Memorial Field detracts from the ceremony.
As Experience Dartmouth (the College's week for introducing prospectives to our school) nears, I begin to wonder what qualities of Dartmouth will remain in the heads of prospectives.
To the Editor: My fellow gym rats should note that Alumni Gymnasium will be closed on April 16.
New York's Republican Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato has managed to add Asian-Americans to the long list of groups he has offended during his 14-year tenure in the Senate. On April 4, D'Amato made a vain attempt at black humor on Don Imus' nationally syndicated radio broadcast.
Anotable feature ofDartmouth culture isthe tendency tosqueeze all manners ofviews and opinions into a restrictive set of categories, namely left, right or (least often) center.Speaking out for or against anything is enough to get one branded a "conservative" or (more often) a "liberal." Quite apart from whether these terms are as deserving of scorn as they are made out to be, are such terms of reference the only ones there are? Confucius once said, "The superior man, in the world, does not set his mind either for anything, or against anything; what is right he will follow."These are wise words indeed, and most of us would like to believe that we live by such a maxim. But how can this be true if we come pre-equipped to see the world from an ideological stance?
With only a few thousand people on the Dartmouth campus at any one time, you may find that you run into some of the same people on a regular basis.
To the Editor: I attended many of the Senior Symposium events, and I thought they were all stimulating and thought-provoking.
Inlight of the recent discussion concerning Playboy's impending visit, a few issues need to be emphasized.
To the Editor: Throughout this past week, candidates for Student Assembly president have plastered walls and distributed all sorts of propaganda on campus.
Today,students have a rare opportunity to affect change and to let their voices be heard. All undergraduates should vote in the student elections. Students will elect the next Student Assembly president, vice president and general Assembly, as well as class officers and Committee on Standards representatives. All campus voices must be heard.
Throughout the lifespan of all political institutions there are periodically elections that redefine the institution itself.
Thechoice is clear. If Dartmouth want an effective government that will serve the students and will bicker less, then tomorrow students must vote for Brandon del Pozo '96 for Student Assembly president and Kelii Opulauoho '96 for vice president. Del Pozo, the most qualified candidate for president, possesses the best understanding of the issues currently facing the Assembly and its role on campus. Opulauoho is the best candidate for vice president because he complements del Pozo well.