An Alternate Interpretation of the Alumni Election
To the Editor: In Joe Asch '79's recent column ("Time for Wright to Step Down," Sept. 26), he cites the election of the Association of Alumni as a referendum on President Jim Wright.
To the Editor: In Joe Asch '79's recent column ("Time for Wright to Step Down," Sept. 26), he cites the election of the Association of Alumni as a referendum on President Jim Wright.
Like much of Dartmouth's student body, I was amazed and intrigued by the fanfare surrounding Wednesday's Democratic debate.
For the last few years, Dartmouth's public relations office has acted as one might expect a company under attack to act: super-positive.
To the Editor: To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, "well Joe, there you go again." In the winter of 2006, Joe Asch '79 wrote an op-ed for The Dartmouth calling for College President James Wright's resignation ("Wright Must Be Replaced," March 1, 2006). Clearly that screed gained no traction among the trustees and alumni of Dartmouth, so now Asch tries again ("Time for Wright to Step Down," Sept.
To the Editor: In Zachary Gottlieb '10's most recent column ("The Gottlieb Roundup," Sept.
I could make you fat. Yep, I said it -- coming into contact with me and befriending me could make you fat.
The word "governance" has many interpretations -- and it has assumed additional shades of meaning in recent years.
Hanover became the center of the political universe Wednesday night as the 2008 Democratic presidential candidates sparred in an eight-way bout that left no single candidate particularly bruised and bloodied and the captive audience mildly amused and, unfortunately, underwhelmed. Entering the nationally-televised verbal jousting match, Illinois Sen.
To be completely honest, I feel a little betrayed. Dartmouth always talks up how New Hampshire's "first in the nation" primary status means that candidates are often stopping by (relative to other schools) and that as students, we get a great deal of access to them.
To the Editor: Having made the best of efforts to separate the rhetorical wheat from the chaff with regard to the "governance thing," I admit to feeling left with a bowl of farina.
All of these governance changes just to save one president's job... Rather than retiring gracefully after six votes of no confidence in his administration (the balloting for four trustees, the referendum on the constitution and the election of the Association of Alumni), College President James Wright is once again putting himself before the welfare of the College in dictating changes to Dartmouth's 116-year-old governance structure. Wright has been able to do this because he has built a fortress around himself by appointing unquestioning supporters to important positions. The current Board is as pliable as they come.
It is nary fall, and this past summer's fiery feuds of gender-oriented frat combatants, demagogue trustees and a lottery for Democratic primary debate tickets are fresh in our hearts and minds. But perhaps a more light-hearted analysis of Dartmouth's battleground political scene will help temper the pugnacious mindsets of Her bra-burning liberals; mint julep-sipping, bow-tied conservatives like Niral Shah '08; and Tim Andreadis '07's ghost, which haunts the Dartmouth Hall lawn.
Over the summer, I once found myself on the subway with a non-New Yorker friend of mine when one of those obnoxious subterranean sermonizers stumbled into our subway car and began to rant.
Once again the whispers of discontent have spurred on drastic change. In my three-plus years at Dartmouth, hardly a term has passed without substantial criticism of the petition process to the College's Board of Trustees or the College's attempts to marginalize petition candidates in both the election and governance process. I must say that I am far from a supporter of the petition candidates most recently elected.
Dartmouth's trial in organizational democracy is no longer in its best interest. But let us be clear, and don't let anyone fool you; the College's current structure of governance isn't really a democracy.
To the Editor: I am glad to see that Zak Moore has not lost his knack for composing articles ("Defying the Nalgene," Aug.
What is important for readers to take away from The Dartmouth's recent article on the actions of the Dartmouth Association of Alumni executive committee ("AOA exec.
The U.S. News & World Report issued the 2008 edition of its illustrious "America's Best Colleges" list Friday and Dartmouth dropped out of the top ten -- from a three-way tie for ninth to eleventh, behind the two with whom it had shared ninth.
"Dude, I did awfully." With exams, papers, and finals, Dartmouth students have many opportunities to do poorly.
The latest environmental craze is taking hold. We have already been told, inconveniently though perhaps of dubious truthiness, that driving, eating meat, non-local produce, flying, turning the lights on, etc.