Parking Policies Are Exorbitant and Unfair to Dartmouth Students
To the Editor: I was one of the 40 fortunate freshmen who were allowed to bring a car back to campus for Spring term.
To the Editor: I was one of the 40 fortunate freshmen who were allowed to bring a car back to campus for Spring term.
With graduation so near, I have had the wonderful opportunity to attend several student thesis presentations this spring term.
To the Editor: I am writing in response to Neil Resnick and Juan Carlos Serna's editorial "Butt Out of Dartmouth's Affairs" in the issue of The Dartmouth dated Monday, May 18. I have come to fully expect wild speculation in The Dartmouth's editorials, but Resnick and Serna's assertion that "four years ago, the prevalence of smoking was not what it is today" prompted me to write anyway.
C Says: So, P, how did that interview go in New York last week? Have you found an internship yet for the summer? P Says: Well, C, it was kind of weird.
A few weeks ago, The Dartmouth reported that the Council on Student Organizations -- which many of us know simply as "COSO" -- was considering new standards for student publications, including a ban on anonymously printed submissions and warnings about article content.
Well, not to make anyone feel inferior, but it seems that -- surprise! -- once again the incoming freshmen are the smartest, most talented people Dartmouth has ever amalgamated into one class.
To the Editor: There are things in this world that I will never understand. I was at Food Court Sunday night and they were out of chocolate milk.
When we first came to Dartmouth nearly four years ago, the prevalence of smoking on campus was not what it is today.
It was my junior fall when I joined the Voices advisory board. I was eligible because I had attended three of the Voices events.
To the Editor: Feeling that the 15 minutes of work I had done certainly warranted another trip to check BlitzMail, I found myself sitting in line for the third time in an hour waiting to get on one of the Baker public computers on the main floor of Baker Library.
With last week's proposed guidelines for monitoring student publications, the Committee on Student Organizations is treading a fine line between censorship and responsible supervision. As Fall term's incidents involving Uncommon Threads and the Jack-O-Lantern illustrate, student outcry often reprimands publications after they have printed offensive material. However, these ex post facto calls for censorship are clearly not an effective means of monitoring student publications. In order to improve the quality and integrity of College-funded publications, COSO should work with them to promote accountability and responsibility without infringing upon rights to free speech. While COSO's proposals are a step toward holding publications to higher standards, not all of the restrictions are necessary, and some may result in more detriment than benefit. Clearly, student publications must adhere to federal obscenity standards. However, the proposal calling for warning labels prominently displayed on publications containing "questionable" material would be an insult to the average Dartmouth student's intelligence and maturity level.
There are essentially two schools of thought on how life is best lived. There are those who believe that the important thing in life is to have a steady, well-paying source of income, to have a nice home and family, to be liked by one's peers and neighbors and to live to old age in good health.
Can you remember a time when you were younger and, oh, such a kid? Perhaps a time when you thought that you would never reach the seventh grade and that all of the eighth graders were the coolest kids in the hallways, their lockers towering over you like pillars of reverence.
Snapshot "Dartmouth students are racist." "He's a faggot." "Dartmouth is up in booneyville, New Hampshire -- totally out of touch with the rest of the world." "Chink!" Death threat with a star of David on a door to someone's home. We are in Hanover, New Hampshire, which indeed could qualify as booneyville.
Maybe it was springtime, with all the flowers in bloom filling the air with sweet, soft scents. Or maybe it was each of my girlfriends, one by one, becoming captured by her own springtime romance.
To the Editor: I must applaud the College Committee on Student Organizations in its valiant effort to protect the delicate sensibilities of the student body.
To the Editor: During the weekend of May 14-16, the Alumni Council of Dartmouth will convene at the College for its semiannual meeting.
Several astute readers of my columns have observed that my opinions often waver between antithetical positions.
To the Editor: To clarify several points in Dave Gacioch's editorial, "It's Not Easy Being Kiewit," in the May 5 The Dartmouth: at no time in recent weeks have any institutional data or mission-critical computing operations been at risk of being lost or corrupted.
To the Editor: It's distressing to learn that the College Committee on Student Organizations is considering rules for student publications which, if implemented, would cast a dark shadow over Dartmouth students' rights of free expression.