A New Mascot Idea
To the Editor: I believe it is time for Dartmouth to make a change in the mascot department; let's be honest, the moose needs to go.
To the Editor: I believe it is time for Dartmouth to make a change in the mascot department; let's be honest, the moose needs to go.
To the Editor: The Nov. 16 column by Jeff Deck ("Against White Ribbons") makes several specious statements about Saturday's White Ribbon Day organized by both the Men's Project and the Women's Resource Center.
To the Editor: This letter regards the article "Police Questions Student" (Nov. 16). I feel that The Dartmouth has displayed extremely poor taste in publishing the name of the student questioned.
Dartmouth College, like most educational institutions in the United States, is involved in a war over free thought.
To the Editor: This is in response to the letter by Tai Antoine '01 ("Mascot is Dehumanizing") of Nov.
To the Editor: I had the privilege of attending the "Racial Profiling" discussion group at the Shabazz house on Nov.
I am not exactly the most patriotic American citizen. I remember when I saw the twin towers in NYC come crashing down, I thought to myself, "OK, Empire America will now begin to drop small mushroom clouds all over the Middle East." Only, America did not.
To the Editor: In her letter to the editor discussing the Indian mascot (Nov. 15), Tai Antoine '01 brings up a couple of points that I would like to address. Point Number 1: Ms. Antoine says, "No group of people would like to see their face (or the face of someone that looks like them) plastered on a T-shirt, baseball cap, trading card, etc.
Recently I received a small green card in my Hinman Box advertising something called "White Ribbon Day" slated for this Saturday, Nov.
After a month and a half of bombing, America has forced the Taliban to flee from their capital city.
To the Editor: The Dartmouth's Nov. 14 article, "Apathy replaces the controversy that surrounded ROTC during the Vietnam era, few students choose ROTC today," is conspicuously one-sided.
To the Editor: I am writing to express my concern about the relationship between very real safety concerns and very real prejudice.
To the Editor: I'm writing on behalf of the Dean of the College Office to express appreciation for The Dartmouth's recent coverage of issues concerning sexual assault and campus safety.
To the Editor: Director of Career Services Skip Sturman's op-ed on the "Perils of Misrepresentation" (Nov.
To the Editor: I'm glad that attentions from The Dartmouth are finally being directed toward the very important issue of the "Indian mascot" ("Students share opinions on Indian mascot," Nov.
After careful deliberation, I have decided that my new title should be: "Rachel Baker, Gallaudet University Plaza Dining Hall Food Comprehension Facilitator." Let me give you a little background info, so that you can follow along.
Most Americans have probably seen the new type of advertising that has emerged since the Sept. 11 attacks.
Over the months I've been writing for "The D," my columns have leaned 90 degrees to the Right, the free market, and the relentless and unfettered pursuit of all the things that we conservatives love -- defense spending, oil drilling, and tax cuts.
About a week and a half ago I bought a new pair of running shoes (not that I go running, mind you, but I am lazy and think they're the comfiest). It was time.
Last weekend, when two female students were assaulted on campus, we were reminded that despite its rural setting, Dartmouth is not insulated from safety concerns.