Learning to Read
Every year, nay, every term, there seems to be an affliction that spreads across campus like wildfire.
Every year, nay, every term, there seems to be an affliction that spreads across campus like wildfire.
To the Editor: Gabrielle Tudin '12's "Take Back the (Saturday) Night!" (Sept. 30) was ridiculous, embarrassing and offensive.
Nina Maja Bergmar '11's "Peace, Love and Respect" (Sept. 29) is an exercise in self-righteous writing, succeeding only at browbeating and berating its audience into anything but agreement with the premises of the piece. Far be it from me to deny that sexism remains a problem at Dartmouth -- it is an urgent issue that needs to be addressed.
Upon arriving on campus for their DOC Trips, freshmen and parents are greeted by an unfamiliar sight.
To the Editor: In "Peace, Love and Respect" (Sept. 29), Nina Maja Bergmar '11 writes about male domination at Dartmouth, saying that "While it's quite logical that women are in charge at Smith [College], since they comprise 100 percent of the student body, it is illogical to me how much power men at Dartmouth have over women, despite their equality in numbers." Wait a second.
Even though most sophomore males have by now either decided to be unaffiliated or are choosing a house based on existing friendships, atmosphere or post-college benefits, there always exists a small portion of campus for which the really hard decision is whether or not to pledge.
I have the utmost pleasure of belonging to the Class of 2012, the best class Dartmouth College has ever had.
Like every responsible American, I tuned into the presidential debate last Friday to watch the two people who aspire to lead our country do battle with proposals and plans.
As I spent my summer in Northampton, Mass., a city renowned for its feminist movement and hippie culture, I came to understand the magnitude of sexism Dartmouth.
My distinguished colleague Zachary Gottlieb '10 recently wrote about Dartmouth as a protective parental figure, asking "When does this tireless parent teach us to fend for ourselves?" ("Dartmouth Man Needs a Maid," Sept.
I love meeting Dartmouth students from my hometown of Seattle. We adamantly discuss how ridiculous umbrellas and those who carry them are, the hellish transnational flight to and from school, and how we can totally say the word "hella" without copying NorCal.
In 1980, Candy Lightner founded Mothers Against Drunk Driving, after her 13-year-old daughter was killed by a drunk driver.
Earlier this summer, I became curious about what kind of kids the incoming '12s would be. So I went to the best source of information for someone who wants to know what people are really like: Facebook.
There are plenty of legitimate reasons for fearing a Palin-McCain White House: One would be John's unwavering confidence, despite the ongoing Wall Street bank-domino, that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong" (of course, if by "the fundamentals of our economy," John really does mean "American workers," then I guess he's right -- but also an idiot). Another good reason to be scared of McPalin: Sarah's self-proclaimed foreign-policy credentials amount to her uncanny ability (and here I paraphrase) to "see Red people" from her backyard. However, despite these and others, there is one overarching reason why I am terrified of a Republican victory in the upcoming election: If Palin-McCain wins, chances are high that Roe v.
In a recent New York Times article, Arlene Spark, associate professor of nutrition at Hunter College in New York, wished that people would consider eating more wholesome foods.
One of the first things you'll hear from your UGA is that until you matriculate, you're not under the protection of the College.
Last week, Serena Williams defeated Jelena Jankovic in the women's final of the U.S. Open to win her ninth singles Grand Slam title.
At the end of his most recent rant ("Consider This," August 15), Zachary Gottlieb '10 concludes that we Dartmouth students are "a bunch of jerks" who have supplied "no evidence to contradict" his belief that our campus is plagued by a "lack of consideration for property, academics and most importantly, people." Gottlieb's argument, which is reminiscent of his previous column's ("Passing the Buck," August 1) criticism of the average Dartmouth student's "numbing apathy", begins with the initial claim that we are all "self-serving, destructive people." This claim is later developed through the use of tragic, firsthand stories of Dartmouth's antisociality: In one, Gottlieb is unable to leave his row during a quiz because his classmates won't pull their legs in; in another, first-comers to a free-pizza event take whole pies, leaving subsequent pizza-hopefuls unsatiated. While there is truth to Gottlieb's argument -- the theft and vandalism that he denounces, as well as other unmentioned forms of abuse (both physical and emotional), are very real problems, even within our "Dartmouth bubble" -- he is misguided both in targeting the "self-serving" aspects of our student body's alleged personality, and in lumping these aspects together with the "destructive" ones.
I was one of those "true believer" freshmen: excited, idealistic and eager as ever to do whatever work was thrown at me.
The summer is dead. Long live the summer! At some point we'll have to face facts and acknowledge the restful passing of a great term.