Greeks Prevent Sexual Assault
I would like to respond to the letter to the editor sent in from Sean Donahue '96 on Feb 17, 1999.
I would like to respond to the letter to the editor sent in from Sean Donahue '96 on Feb 17, 1999.
To the Editor: The fraternity and sorority members are not protesting so loudly because they are afraid of losing their strangle hold on the Dartmouth party scene.
To the Editor: I am writing this letter on behalf of Gamma Delta Chi to acknowledge that we allowed adult entertainment to occur within the confines of our house.
To the Editor: I am writing this letter on behalf of the Dartmouth Football Team to apologize for our recent actions.
When I first read about the Trustees' apocryphal announcement of the five principles and their implications for the Greek system "as we know it," I was as cynical and defensive as many of my peers.
You walked past as I stood on the Green. I asked you to stop -- to link arms, but with a "I'm late for class.
To the Editor: I normally like to keep my views out of the public forum, but in light of David Cohen's inane Vox Clamantis on Friday, I feel obliged to comment.
To the Editor: I would like to take a moment to respond to the column by Leyla Kamalick in the Feb.
To the Editor: In the article "National Greek Organizations Respond to Threat,"(Friday, February 19th), Psi Upsilon's executive director, Mark Williams, is reported as saying that the international fraternity would allow the coeducation of Psi U.
Two years ago, students who attended informational meetings of the College Committee on Alcohol and Other Drugs were outraged that the College could be so misinformed as to blame the Greek system for the alcohol abuse on campus without throwing any of the blame on themselves.
We've all just been handed an incredible opportunity to effect positive change on campus -- and with it, an (almost) blank check.
Everyone seems to be against President Wright. He took quite a drastic move. Who did he think he was kidding?
I will begin by saying that by writing this, I am sure to alienate and anger several Greek-affiliated people whom I hold close to my heart because I support the decision made by the Trustees and President of the College.
To the Editor: With the recent announcement that fraternities and sororities are to be made coed or be destroyed in the name of inclusiveness and community, there has come to light a hint of the progression to come that will deliver Dartmouth from its unhappy state of diversity and choice to a shining, golden homogeneity.
To the Editor: In the very important discussions that have been occurring regarding the changes to take place on the Dartmouth campus, we are concerned about the definition of community that is commonly held.
To the Editor: The recent proposal to make the Greek System totally coed is flawed in myriad ways.
To the Editor: I am writing to respond to questions raised by Amy Mikolajczyk'99 in her recent column in The Dartmouth.
To the Editor: For all of us Dartmouth students past and present who fought the existence of the regressive Greek system and for all the professors and administrators who supported us, congratulations!
To the Editor: The future of the Greek system is almost beside the point. What is shocking is the utterly craven approach the Trustees and the President have taken to what they surely knew would be a controversial decision. Where was the mention of eliminating the Greek system during Wright's inauguration?