To the Editor: I am writing in response to the article in Tuesday's Dartmouth regarding Ozzie Harris' departure from the College ("Diversity chief Harris unexpectedly resigns," March 28). I have known Ozzie for over 20 years, and during this time, we have worked together on numerous projects and initiatives.
To the Editor: Your article "Controversy erupts over Al-Nur website" (July 15, The Dartmouth) incorrectly states that "Potential sanctions against Al-Nur could be dealt with through the Office of Pluralism and Leadership." In fact, the Office of Pluralism and Leadership has no authority or responsibility for imposing any sanctions on students.
To the Editor: One of the things I enjoy the most about working with Dartmouth students is that so many contribute their time and energy to make the campus experience a positive one.
To The Editor: First let me thank you for writing such a wonderful article welcoming Dawn Hemphill to the campus in your August 2 edition.
To the Editor: I read with sadness the description of the incident at Psi Upsilon fraternity and am writing to assure the community that the administration does indeed take incidents like these very seriously.
To the Editor: I am writing to respond to questions raised by Amy Mikolajczyk'99 in her recent column in The Dartmouth.
To the Editor: Last year , Palaeopitus challenged all of us at the College to reaffirm our commitment to the Principle of Community.
Given the recent discussions on campus about reviving the Indian symbol, I thought it might be helpful to share with the newer members of our community a statement former Dean of the Tucker Foundation Warner Traynham made regarding the Indian symbol.
To the Editor: I am writing as someone who has been a part of the Dartmouth community for 24 years and who believes that we can be the community we say we are; that is, a community in which each member is valued and respected.
To the Editor: As the adviser to the Student Assembly, I wanted to write in an attempt to refocus the conversation with regard to Danielle Moore '95's resignation. Many people have written challenging the rationale behind her decision, and yet the fact that other women leaders have not experienced the same treatment does not invalidate Moore's experience. It's easy to spend time second guessing her decision . It is harder to take on the challenge she presented and to look critically at the way leaders are supported on this campus. It saddens me that her situation is not unique.