To the Editor: It is certainly understandable that The Dartmouth Editorial Board chose to endorse John Kerry for President ("Verbum Ultimum," The Dartmouth, October 22). What is less understandable is that they chose to continue spreading the absurd idea that a draft is in the offing.
To the Editor: Regarding, "SA: Campus must wait for Coke-Pepsi results" (May 11). I find the inference that the campus was misled by the Assembly when they referred to the vote as a referendum puzzling.
To the Editor: In Scott Jacobs' column and a multi-authored letter to the editor ("SA's Resolution Ignores Non-Affiliated Interests") of April 15, several crticisms were made of the resolution sponsored by Ryan Clark '01 and myself.
To the Editor: This Thursday's "What is Ghetto?" discussion group contained the single most offensive speech I have ever heard.
To the Editor: Regarding "Butt Out of Dartmouth's Affairs" (The Dartmouth, May 20) -- Neil Resnick and Juan Carlos Serna call for an effort to reduce the prevalence of smoking on campus and for the College to divest itself of its tobacco stocks by the way of sending a message to the students.
To the Editor: In his column ["Life's Most Important Question," The Dartmouth, Feb. 27] Billy Wynne asks how "those in the 'selfish' school of thought" answer the question: What am I doing for other people?
To the Editor: In his column "A Message to Conservatives" [The Dartmouth, Feb. 18], Seth Abramson '98 makes too many inaccurate claims to address in one letter.
To the Editor: In the article, "Publications face COSO politics," [The Dartmouth, January 19], there are two statements made which require a response.
To the Editor, In his letter to the Dartmouth on November 7, "Jack-O Derecognition Would Be Expressive of Sincere, Yet Misguided Campus Anger," Matthew Benedetto makes a valid point regarding the mistake inherent in a derecognition of the Jack-O.