Getting Something Back
How far should the College go to encourage us to make the most of our time here and have the best Dartmouth experience?
How far should the College go to encourage us to make the most of our time here and have the best Dartmouth experience?
Friday's Verbum Ultimum discussed the absence of petition candidates in this year's AoA elections. What are your reactions to the news that the leadership of the Association will run unopposed?
As I stood amidst a crowd numbering in the millions, I felt the collective joy and hope of a nation participating in the greatest democracy of our world.
It is now evident that the current leadership of the College's Association of Alumni will run unopposed in the organization's spring election ("No petition candidates to run in AoA election," Jan.
I take issue with the claims made by Peter Blair '12 in his most recent column ("Love Beyond the Brain," Jan.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. stopped just short of calling the United States government a terrorist organization.
Science has been pretty good to us, don't you think? Granted, there have been some abominable developments thrust upon us, like nuclear weapons and Windows Vista, but let's face it: we like our iPods and televisions far too much to give them all up and start churning butter.
In her recent piece about the questionable scientific basis for love ("The Love Doctor," Jan. 27), Emily Johnson '12 argues, "I don't think the knowledge that oxytocin is a big part of the reason two people can look at one another with eyes full of love on their 50th wedding anniversary can lessen the beauty of their bond, nor detract from the meaning that bond gave their lives." After spending most of her article degrading love by attempting to convince us that it is reducible to physical processes, Johnson then tries to rescue love from the grave she has dug for it.
As I watched Obama's inauguration last Thursday, I felt hopeful and moved (which I expected), but also a little concerned (which I did not expect). Before the inauguration, Brian Solomon '11 asked "what President Obama can say on this day that will ... ignite the passions of Americans" ("A Time (For Us) To Act," Jan.
Two weeks ago, Barack Obama's impending inauguration was filling 18-year-old me with a "now-I've-seen-everything" smugness.
Did you know that if you Google search the term "student-athlete" on The Dartmouth's web site archives, you get over 110 article hits?
Friday's Verbum Ultimum called for the 17th College president to make aggressive moves in restoring Dartmouth to a position of collegiate primacy. What is the first such move you would recommend?
I was sort of stunned when he said it. No, I'm not talking about Dr. Joseph Lowery's humorous end to his profound benediction, or Chief Justice John Roberts's flubbing of the oath of office, or Obama's miscounting when he said, "44 Americans have now taken the presidential oath" (43 have). Nor am I talking about Obama's bluntness when speaking about our nation's dire situation or our role in its fixing.
To the Editor: With the smugness of one totally assured of his own place in the world, Peter Blair '12 ("Priority Report," Jan.
As we finish honoring the life of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., it is appropriate to reflect that he believed in an outdated idea: love.
In Tuesday's inaugural address, President Barack Obama confronted Americans with a stark and unambiguous diagnosis of the times: "That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood," Obama said.
In her recent column, "Distributive Justice" (Jan. 15), Tina Praprotnik says, "[T]he main goal of distributive requirements should be to produce well-rounded graduates and to encourage students to explore subjects outside of their chosen field of study." She goes on to point out the flaws in the distributive requirement system, and how that system prevents students from making the most of their undergraduate experience by forcing them to take obscure courses simply to fulfill requirements.
I was sitting in my Government 49 class last week when Professor Baldez asked which of the present students had been part of a protest.
Although he would probably never admit it, I bet someone reading this article stayed up all night on his 11th birthday, eagerly hoping an owl would deliver an acceptance letter from Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.
Micaela Klein's recent guest column ("An OPAL in the Rough," Jan. 15) was an impassioned defense of the Office of Pluralism and Leadership.