Weathering the Storm
They really should offer a class on how to manipulate the Dartmouth Plan. I feel like I stumbled blindly into my enrollment pattern.
They really should offer a class on how to manipulate the Dartmouth Plan. I feel like I stumbled blindly into my enrollment pattern.
As I attempt to produce another column, I find in me, again, an urge to refute what I have previously written.
Dartmouth's education department and Jimmy Hoffa have more in common than you might think. Both were up against a powerful and secretive group that wanted them eliminated.
To the Editor: Last Saturday I attended the "Crisis is Nigeria" discussion presented by AfriCaSo in which key note speaker, Hafisat Abiola, daughter of the imprisoned president-elect, described the plight of her family and her country.
To the Editor: John Dewey said: "What we want and need is education pure and simple, and we shall make surer and faster progress when we devote ourselves to finding out what education is and what conditions have to be satisfied in order that education may be a reality and not a name or slogan." Moreover, "the constant factors [in education] are the formation of ideas, acting upon ideas, observation of the conditions which result, and organization of facts and ideas for future use." When this cycle of learning is embraced by an entire community, it represents the essence of democracy and the core purpose of a liberal arts college. The education department is a century-old experiment.
To the Editor: On July 27, 1995, Congress and the President of the United States sent a message to the citizens of this country -- they are willing to suspend all major environmental legislation to allow timber companies to log in previously protected areas.
One of the springtime rites of passage of every Dartmouth sophomore is picking a major. In spite of the mercurial nature of our recent selections, a major question has since festered in my mind: What says more about a person -- their major, or the reasons they choose that major? In order to alleviate your "anticipating columnist cliche" pains, I will get my hackneyed but applicable dose of cliches out of the way early and rephrase my question at the same time: Do your means justify your ends, or do your ends justify your means (perhaps more idealistically, can your ends ever truly justify your means?). An overdue explanation will now follow. As far as my sophomore eyes see it, the major scenario plays out to three general schools of thought. First, there is the anal-retentive career-oriented bunch who choose their major for the sole purpose of inflating their grade point average (the most over-heard, over-emphasized words on any Ivy League campus) to the brink of its 4.0 boundary. Second, there are the premeditated pre-professionals whose tunnel-visioned folks have scoped out the most accommodating job market.
The discussion on May 9 on the future of the education department revealed numerous important issues to futher examine.
To the Editor: On Thursday, May 9, I attended the discussion about the future of the education department here at the College.
After a long weekend of mediocre revelry and occasional insanity, a friend and I sat down outside the Hop on a fine rainy Sunday morning.
What good is history? Since Herodotus first earned himself the title "father of lies," it has been the penchant of a few men to note down accounts of the words and deeds of the ages preceding theirs. Perhaps, as Henry Ford suggested, these men have been wasting their time; perhaps, like the alchemists and astrologers, they were chasing after nonsense; perhaps what we really need in this age is to do away with history entirely and concentrate on subjects which will fit men to deal with the problems and occupations of our day. At this point Santayana's famous quip on the matter comes to mind, but this is not a good defense, for even if history has lessons to teach us, we must not forget that history never repeats itself -- perhaps it is sometimes better that we do not pay too close attention to what learned accounts tell us. There is a better defense of the study of history.
Circa 1370 BCE, the Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten moved his capital north from Thebes to the city of Tell-el-Amarna.
In "Confronting Reverse Racism" [The Dartmouth, May 6], Adam Siegel '98 points to Ward Connerly, the man spearheading the drive to abolish affirmative action programs in California, as an example of why these programs are no longer necessary.
To the Editor: Does anyone remember the last time when 105 Dartmouth Hall was filled with over 300 passionate students, faculty, alumni and local teachers?
To the Editor: Thursday nights at 8 p.m., a ritual ensues much of the campus joins Rachel, Ross, Monica, Phoebe, Joey, and Chandler for a half hour of adventures in New York City.
Abolishing the education department flies in the face of the College's aim to provide students with a well-rounded education and to equip them with an appreciation for the value of education. With the privilege of attending Dartmouth comes a responsibility to make a positive contribution to society.
One of the fundamental purposes of Dartmouth College is to educate men and women who have a high potential for making a significant positive impact on society -- so states the first sentence of the Dartmouth College Student Handbook.
The College has failed to live up to its commitment to fostering community at Dartmouth and to the College's Native American community by not allowing this year's annual pow-wow to take place on the Green. With an expected increase in attendance, it was necessary for this year's community celebration to be relocated from its usual site at the Bema.
To the Editor: As a representative of the newly re-established Dartmouth Students for Choice group, I feel compelled to respond to Ellen Wight '97's column "Being Pro-choice and Anti-Abortion" [The Dartmouth, May 3]. I find it very unfortunate that somehow the term pro-choice has come to mean pro-death or pro-abortion in the minds of some of the "lost middle of Americans" that Wight refers to in her column, as the assumed antithesis of the term "pro-life." This has never been the case; the pro-choice movement has never advocated making abortion more widespread or less ethically serious.
To the Editor: This letter is in response to Adam Siegel '98's column "Confronting Reverse Racism" [The Dartmouth, May 6]. To point to men such as Ward Connerly or Clarence Thomas and say that America no longer needs affirmative action is like holding up a few apples that grew wormless and say the rest of the orchard doesn't need pesticide.