Opposing Perspectives
Reasoned expression in academic writing and, most importantly, in public discourse should be our goal.
Reasoned expression in academic writing and, most importantly, in public discourse should be our goal.
To the Editor: As a prospective Dartmouth student (I am eagerly and nervously awaiting that fateful letter in April), I was browsing through your paper online and came across Alex DiGiorgio's article "Get Over It," that appeared on March 2.
To the Editor: I must comment on Joshua McCurdy's letter in the March 2 issue of The Dartmouth.
To the Editor: The high-falutin words of one Ali Rashid ("A Legacy of Racism, Sexism," March 1, 2001) are to be admired.
It doesn't always happen, but yesterday's snow proved that our friendly weatherman's (or woman's) prediction was correct.
Dartmouth takes great pride in hailing itself as a close-knit residential college, and much of the Student Life Initiative aims at improving the residential experience.
Exiled in the River dorms during the fall of 1999, I barely noticed or cared much about the massive structure being built on Baker's northern side.
To the members of the Dartmouth community: I would like to respond to the very thoughtful editorial by Eleanor Leahy that appeared in The Dartmouth on February 23.
To the Editor: What has been done to Lynda and Stan Williams is unforgivable. Our press, under the guise of "freedom of speech," is taking liberties that would be executable in other countries.
I am a white, heterosexual, able-bodied male. I'll admit it: my first reaction to the email regarding the Psi U incident was probably not unique among all the other white, heterosexual guys on this campus.
To the Editor: I am one of the few people that knows exactly what happened with the "Cuban Party," mentioned in Ali Rashid's column in yesterday's issue of The Dartmouth.
To the Editor: As Co-Presidents of the class of 2003, we would like to clear up some misconceptions that Leah Threatte presented in her article last Wednesday.
To the Editor: Inappropriate actions should have consequences. If Psi Upsilon fraternity doesn't stand for racism and sexism, then they should remove those members whose actions are inappropriate.
I must admit I've been surprised at some recent responses to the incident-of-the-term, Psi U's "Wah-Hoo-Wah!" cheers.
To the Editor: I am writing this in response to the article written by Leah Threatte '01, that appeared on Wednesday, February 28, 2001: The auction about which Ms. Threatte has complained was a community-service activity to raise funds for Upper Valley charities, as she herself states. From the sounds of it, this event had nothing to do with the issue of slavery or race, except insofar as it was called an "auction." While I agree with Ms. Threatte that slavery was a terrible chapter in American history, I fail to see the connection she is making between a community service event intended to benefit the poor with the African slave trade.
To the Editor: In the fall of my senior year, I attended an informal Safety and Security meeting in my cluster -- a sort of question/answer/scare the 'shmen kind of thing.
To the Editor: To add to Liam Kuhn's editorial which ran on Feb. 26, "Deeds, Not Just Words," I would like to insert some of my own experiences as a Dartmouth senior one term away from graduation.
To the Editor: I applaud Ms. Peric's opening statement, "So it's not exactly 'Naked News,' but it's still the prototypical lazy frat boy's dream come true," from her recent article (A Whole New Breed of Cheating), for boldly going where no one has gone before and taking a cheap shot at fraternity members.
To the Editor: I write concerning the incident that happened on the Psi Upsilon fraternity lawn and porch two weekends past.
To the Editor: Before any discussion of door locks can proceed, I want to call into question Dean of Residential Life Martin Redman's logic in citing the primary student concern as "having access to each other's residence halls." While this is certainly a novel, hardly ancillary concern that emerges from the consideration of door locks, the controversy of the issue extends much further than universal dorm access. We are all aware of the attempts by the Office of Residential Life to discourage malice come Homecoming, Winter Carnival, and Green Key.