To the Editor: The Dartmouth's editorial staff should check with their own writers to get their facts straight before forming and presenting opinions ("An Old Tradition Fails, Again," Oct.
Regarding "Regaining the Right Role" (May 9) by Doug Keare '56, responses by Association of Alumni petition candidates warrant consideration.
The current trustee election raises the old debates: undergraduate versus graduate education, college versus university, teaching versus research.
To the Editor: Nathan Bruschi '10 presented a carefully-articulated argument ("Affirmative Action Too Skin Deep?" Feb.
To the Editor: Peter Fahey '68's recent letter supporting the proposed constitution made several points, some which merit consideration and some of which are incorrect, such as the erroneous belief that the current trustee election rules force a splitting of votes across nominated candidates ("Five Reasons to Vote, and Vote "Yes,"" Sept.
Yes, it's yet another guest editorial on "alumni governance" issues. Why care at all? Because College priorities are ultimately set by Dartmouth's trustees, and students are impacted in many ways, from rooming alternatives to course availability to resource allocations that impact your activities.