To the Editor: September 11th's terrorist attacks in Washington and New York brought us all a horrifying reminder of the tremendous suffering that occurs when a city is bombed.
To the Editors: When I graduated from Dartmouth I pledged that I would never give money to the college as long as there were fraternities on campus.
To the Editor: Garrett Gil De Rubio '96 and Kimberly Koontz '96 seem to think that if we all just stop arguing about institutional racism and institutional sexism Dartmouth will somehow become a real community.
To the Editor: I was deeply disturbed to learn that the Coed Fraternity Sorority system received a grant from the Bildner Endowment to do diversity programing.
To the Editor: In 1991, the United States expressed outrage against Iraq's treatment of its Kurdish minority, using Iraqi human rights abuses as a justification for the Gulf War.
To the Editor: The organized, intentional disruption of Professor Tom Luxon's presentation of the Alpha Chi Alpha Fraternity "Hell Night" tape and the Alpha Delta Fraternity "Sex Room" tape was a violation of the most basic standards of decency and civility and an attack on Dartmouth's community of scholars. Professor Luxon was invited to present his analysis of two documents and then lead a discussion about the issues they raised.
To the Editor: In an otherwise excellent and insightful opinion piece ("The True Face of the New Right," May 3, 1995), Christopher Houpt '98 incorrectly characterized anarchists and Earth First!ers as advocates of violence.
EffrainBamaca Velasquez is dead. And the taxes I paid helped to pay for his murder. These are the irrefutable facts.
It has been over a year now since the Committee on Community and Diversity at Dartmouth released its report which concluded that little had changed since the 1989 report of the Committee on Diversity.
To the Editor: In your article, "Some flock to rush while others oppose," (Sept. 29), you wrote "Sean Donahue '96 and other members of Panarchy, an undergraduate society, began distributing pamphlets asking women and men interested in rush to reconsider their position." This is misleading -- not all of the people involved in making and distributing the flyers were members of Panarchy -- in fact, at least half of the people involved were not Panarchists.