Countering Specious Logic
By Lauren Foley | May 28, 2002To the Editor: Steven Lulich's May 22 response ("On Homosexual Rights") to Chris Curran's May 20 column "The Right Thing for the Right Wing" is an exercise in misguided rhetoric.
To the Editor: Steven Lulich's May 22 response ("On Homosexual Rights") to Chris Curran's May 20 column "The Right Thing for the Right Wing" is an exercise in misguided rhetoric.
To the Editor: In Friday's issue, the Dartmouth Editorial Board criticized Professor Caterine for his grading policy, asserting that "though he is the recipient of a Student Assembly award for excellence in teaching, Caterine doesn't compare to other faculty who have a greater respect for the feedback process." This could not be further from the truth.
To the Editor: I would like to challenge the apparent belief of the majority of Dartmouth campus that the act of a few of the Psi U brothers on Friday night, does not reflect the prevalent attitude of the entire house.
To the Editor: As a prospective student (a mere seven months ago), the aspects of Dartmouth that impressed me were that it was not trying to impress its students with new and modern materialistic allures.