Abortion debate part III -- Keep it legal, but ...
Every weekend here at Dartmouth, students engage in multifarious extracurricular activities. With a little luck, such activities will have very little to do with abortion.
Every weekend here at Dartmouth, students engage in multifarious extracurricular activities. With a little luck, such activities will have very little to do with abortion.
Dim fluorescent lightbulbs force students to use less efficient lighting sources
I am angry. I'm angry about the fact that I have this stupid column to write, angry that I've a paper due Friday, angry that most of my friends are out of school already, and angry that I could be playing Frisbee -- not disc -- instead of doing any work. Obviously, the source of my aggressions is the weather.
This is not an assault on the Greek system. Many good times have preceded this incident. I only hope that the following will be a constructive lesson to make an enjoyable, improving system even better.
Many of you have probably seen the "Women dig it" commercial. A man takes a lie detector test as he answers the question, "Why buy a Paseo?" Two buttons appear on the screen three times.
Recently, an organization of 2,000 Dartmouth alumni has been complaining about what they perceive to be an excessive number of administrators at the College. The group, called the Hopkins Institute, charges that the College is wasting money on these unnecessary employees and that the resulting bureaucracy is cluttering the administration.
The passing of Green Key is a symbol that summer is just around the corner. Students of the College spend their summers in a variety of ways.
Recently, Senator Sam Nunn, head of the Armed Services Committee, touts the gay ban compromise in the Senate as a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
With women rapidly achieving parity at Dartmouth, it seems unfair to have five working sororities versus 15 fraternities.
In celebration of the end of this weekend's alcohol-consecrating festival, which I have personally found to be vastly superior to winter's pseudo-carnival, I will return to a suitably serious topic in order to get your brains moving past the hangovers from which you are undoubtedly suffering: abortion. In last week's column I set my goal at trying to refute that abortion was justified on the grounds that a person has sole control over her body and what she can do with it, although abortion is perhaps defensible on other grounds.
The College lacks an intelligent forum for discussion of the benefits of marijuana
They are packing them in at the new Dirt Cowboy Cafe. Every time I have stopped into the new coffee shop on Main Street it has been crowded.
Several students of mine have talked about driving across the country, but have been put off by fears for their safety or budgetary constraints. Do it, I say.
I've been following this whole melodrama of The Review censoring with a mixture of amusement and disgust.
For a man, the safest thing to do when a debate abortion comes up is to run in the opposite direction in fear.
This term the Coed Fraternity and Sorority Council has been working to rectify the perceived inequalities in CFS elections.
After a year of service on the Committee on Standards, I have witnessed an appalling number of academic dishonesty cases and an even larger number of excuses. Perhaps what is most upsetting is the lack of respect some students have towards the quality of their scholarship and the integrity of their classmates.
In this Student Assembly Presidential election women and so-rorities have been ignored. Out of seven there has been only one female candidate in each race.
My colleague and good friend George Will has focused a kleig light on an outrage at the University of Pennsylvania.