Divestment Clarified
To the Editor: In response to Yan Shurin's comment in The Dartmouth about the legitimacy of divestment, there seems to be some misunderstanding ("Disapproving of Divestment," Nov.
To the Editor: In response to Yan Shurin's comment in The Dartmouth about the legitimacy of divestment, there seems to be some misunderstanding ("Disapproving of Divestment," Nov.
To the Editor: Concerning Michael Kreicher's editorial on Nov. 17 ("BbOne Tragedy"), I must offer a different opinion on the matter.
Dartmouth students are known for their "work hard, play hard" mentality and their dominant competitive streak.
Terrell Owens, the controversially outspoken yet unquestionably talented wide receiver for the Philadelphia Eagles, has once again found himself front and center in a debate that has quickly burgeoned beyond the scope of the NFL. On Nov.
To the Editor: When Hunter Brooks '08 ("Hyper-sensitivity versus real discrimination," Nov.
Throughout my four terms at Dartmouth, I have been spoiled by the plethora of conveniences provided by the College.
To the Editor: While I definitely applaud the sentiment and motivation behind all the efforts towards divestment from Sudan-related companies ("Trustees vote to divest from Sudan-related companies," Nov.
To the Editor: I am writing to congratulate Dartmouth College, the Darfur Action Group and specifically Niral Shah '08, Janet Smith '08, Kelsey Noonan '08 and Anne Bellows '06 for their leadership on the issue of divestment . On Monday, the nation's most extensive university divestment effort culminated in a decision of historic proportions.
Iden Sinai '07's recent op-ed ("Opposition to Alito is unfounded," Nov. 10) carelessly dismisses any opposition to President Bush's latest nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Samuel Alito, without making any actual attempt to understand it. Calling arguments from the left "facile and ill-founded," Sinai first attacks critics for calling Alito unqualified for the Supreme Court.
To the Editor: A recent Dartmouth Mirror article ("The Co-Eds," Nov. 11) contained a substantial omission, as it failed to include Amarna, one of Dartmouth's two undergraduate societies.
The role of Student Assembly at Dartmouth is pretty simple: to help improve life at Dartmouth and to convey student concerns to the administration.
To the Editor: While I agree with the basic premise of the recent Verbum Ultimum (Nov. 11), you are mistaken to paint the sum of money allocated to the Katrina relief efforts with the same brush of criticism as you do many of Student Assembly's budgetary decisions. You write about the break in precedent.
While conversing with me about his Democratic party canvassing work this past summer, my friend uttered something that struck me as highly interesting: "When I walked up to a house that had American flags prominently displayed, I assumed that it was a conservative house.
The war was "unnecessarily and unconstitutionally commenced by the President" and justified by the "sheerest deception." These are not the words of some liberal New England Democrat about the current Iraq war, but those of Congressman Abraham Lincoln in the U.S.
Technology writers have likened the internet to the Wild West (it's an analogy I am not particularly fond of, for reasons that will become clear soon enough, but for the moment I will just run with it). Cyberspace, the argument goes, is a new and effectively boundless frontier that is open for expansion.
A realization struck me, as it has many others, last night reading The New York Times: two op-eds -- one on environmental degradation in China, the other on the riots in France by the poor and disenfranchised -- are connected.
Students often comment on how quickly our four years at Dartmouth go by -- how we must cherish our time here because it will be over before we know it.
Last Friday in a well-subscribed government class, a young man was writing notes to a girl next to him.
Bush's choice of nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court is neither surprising nor outrageous. I imagine that if Clinton were to nominate a conservative, he would encounter a negative response from his Democratic supporters as well as from Republicans.
To the Editor: Why should anyone be any more alarmed at the election of supposedly conservative and anti-establishment trustees to the board than he or she might have been at the election of liberal or radical trustees beginning in the '60s?