Welcome to the newest installment of, “How much further can the administrators drive Dartmouth into the ground?” In the past two weeks, the College derecognized one fraternity, and suspended a sorority and gender-inclusive house were suspended. It is quite apparent that the administrators have an anti-Greek agenda.
There was one positive to my trip to see Donald Trump’s rally in Claremont, New Hampshire, last week: I got a free pin emblazoned with Trump’s face and the words “Haters Gonna Hate.” Unfortunately, that nifty souvenir did not make up for having to listen to Trump alternatively stroke his own ego, insult all the other presidential candidates and make racist comments. Much like his campaign up until this point, the rally was all pomp and no substance. Despite Donald Trump’s own opinion of himself, I really do not believe him to be the interloper messiah – come to save politics from itself – that so many Republicans are making him out to be.
The end of the first-year ban brings new considerations for ’19s.
The results of the Association of American Universities Survey on Sexual Assault are troubling for what they show about sexual assault education and its retention.
We can learn much more than a narrow focus on curriculum topics suggests.
The Dartmouth I attend today is not the Dartmouth to which I matriculated nearly three years ago.
The hard alcohol ban is paternalistic and hinders personal development.
The College should formally acknowledge gray area sexual encounters.
To combat poor admissions trends, the College must listen to its students.
Unity and progress depend on students’ ability to relate to one another.