Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Support independent student journalism. Support independent student journalism. Support independent student journalism.
The Dartmouth
April 4, 2026
The Dartmouth

Conscription isn't the answer

To the Editor:

In his Feb. 8 column on the war on terror ("Undemocratic War for Democracy"), Max Bryer '08 argues that the Bush administration should have "call[ed] on average Americans to bear the costs" of the war. He complains that the American people "are never called upon to be the instruments of the president's policy," for instance through a draft, and he insists that "a more drastic mobilization of the American people is necessary."

This is a misguided analysis. To prevail in the war on terror, the United States needs the most effective and best-equipped soldiers in the world -- and today's American military, composed entirely of volunteers, is the world's most effective fighting force. The nation's military leadership rejects conscription outright: Gen. Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last year that "we do not as a nation need the draft." If America is to sustain the spending necessary to prevail in this long war, we must maintain a strong economy. It would be irresponsible and contrary to our national security interests to impose economic burdens on the population to achieve a feel-good policy of "shared sacrifice" or "mobilization."