To the Editor:
I was pleasantly surprised by the findings published on Monday ["A Solution to the Christmas/Holiday Tree and Ceremony Debacle," Oct. 20, The Dartmouth] and would like to commend them. I do take exception, however, at their suggestion that the tree be moved.
Calling the tree a Christmas tree is most appropriate, as the decorating of trees has been part of the Christmas tradition for years. Implying that the tree is there to celebrate the winter or the "holiday season" is just not accurate; it is there for Christmas, just as the menorah that is set up outside of Collis is there to celebrate Hanukah.
Christmas trees and menorahs are not secular objects. They are parts of rich religious traditions that deserve to be celebrated. By banishing rich religious customs, our College last year deprived students of the chance to appreciate and learn from the diversity that Dartmouth so often prides itself on. Kudos to the committee for wanting to restore religion to religious symbols.
The notion that the Christmas tree be moved, however, is offensive to both Dartmouth tradition and anyone's sense of aesthetic beauty. Part of the beauty of the tree is derived from it being at the center of the Green, in front of either the Baker Library tower or the Dartmouth Hall tower, depending on where the viewer is. The logical place to put a tree is in the middle of the Green, where it blends in so gracefully with its surroundings. Friends of mine of other faiths have remarked to me how much they love the tree for its beauty. It should stay in its traditional spot.
The people in charge have an opportunity to do what is right for the College this year. Exposure to diverse traditions makes Dartmouth the fascinating place that it is. Keep the Christmas tree where it is. Calling a Christmas tree a tree is like calling a menorah a candlestick. Let us enjoy the richness of our own holidays and learn about and appreciate the richness of others'.
