Letter to the Editor: Advice for President Beilock.
Re: Dartmouth only Ivy to abstain from signing letter against Trump administration funding cuts
Use the fields below to perform an advanced search of The Dartmouth's archives. This will return articles, images, and multimedia relevant to your query.
1000 items found for your search. If no results were found please broaden your search.
Re: Dartmouth only Ivy to abstain from signing letter against Trump administration funding cuts
Re: Dartmouth Only Ivy to Abstain from Signing Letter Against Trump Administration Funding Cuts
Re: Dartmouth Only Ivy to Abstain from Signing Letter Against Trump Administration Funding Cuts
Re: Dartmouth Only Ivy to Abstain from Signing Letter Against Trump Administration Funding Cuts
Re: Dartmouth Only Ivy to Abstain from Signing Letter Against Trump Administration Funding Cuts
“We urge everyone to speak out and actively participate in our democracy. As Coretta Scott King said: ‘The struggle is a never-ending process. Freedom is never really won. You earn it and win it in every generation.’”
On April 23, Dartmouth solidified its place as a follower. Instead of standing up for higher education and our values, Dartmouth chose to sit by as Harvard leads the way in saying “no” to Trump.
To quote Charles B. Strauss ’34, an early student-activist and writer at the College: “The liberal college as the alumni knew it is slipping away. Its traditional sort of activity, whether at Dartmouth or at any other institution of its kind, is being repudiated more and more.”
Dear President Beilock,
As of April 21, the College has refused to bargain with our union in any further negotiating sessions. They have also refused to extend the current Dartmouth Dining student worker contract. What this means is that the College’s legal counsel rejected meeting with our rank-and-file, student-led bargaining team moving forward, making it more challenging to contractually preserve many of our vital protections for student workers, such as hour and workload security, discipline and discharge, and grievance protections for student workers seeking to resolve issues with their employer. In sum, the College has refused to protect key benefits for hundreds of student workers — especially against law enforcement officials and the rising cost of tuition.
Re: Dartmouth only Ivy to abstain from signing letter against Trump administration funding cuts
Re: Dartmouth only Ivy to abstain from signing letter against Trump administration funding cuts
Re: Dartmouth only Ivy to abstain from signing letter against Trump administration funding cuts
“Drill, baby, drill!”— to quote President Donald Trump’s inaugural address — is an acute synopsis of the Trump administration’s environmental policy. In just four months, Trump has gutted the Environmental Protection Agency, dismantled federal environmental justice initiatives, reinvigorated coal mining and unlawfully blocked clean energy funding. Critically, he has done this with the support of fossil fuel executives he has placed in positions of power such as Department of Energy secretary Chris Wright, the CEO of fracking company Liberty Energy. He has doubled down on utilizing oil and gas, despite the scientific consensus on the need for a reduction in the use of fossil fuels. His administration cut nearly $4 million in funding to Princeton University on the absurd premise that climate research is adding to climate anxiety. In reality it is inaction by those in power that keeps us up at night — not scientists doing their best to understand, solve and communicate the problem.
Picture this: it’s Friday night after a busy week, and you and your friends decide to share dinner in town. When it’s time to pay the bill, you look at your server, reach for your Dartmouth ID, and say, “I’d like to use Dartmouth dining dollars, please.” Now, what if I told you that this scenario isn’t as far from reality as you may think?
Navigating Dartmouth Dining has never been a walk in the park for disabled students. Dining locations are crowded and noisy; the A-9 station, while helpful, is not vegetarian-friendly; and if Dartmouth Dining can’t accommodate your needs, making the move to off-campus housing that would allow one to cook for themself isn’t always financially or physically feasible.
The “Dartmouth Bubble” is real. Although it’s impossible to say what exactly causes it, I think geographic isolation and rigorous courses of study often prevent students from engaging with the world beyond our campus. Right now though, things are different. It feels like the world is coming to Dartmouth in a way that it almost never does, frantically waving its arms and begging us to notice.
It’s no secret that certain hiring pipelines dominate Dartmouth’s campus: according to the 2023 Cap and Gown Survey, an annual College-run evaluation of where graduates plan to work, 46% of Dartmouth graduates were working in either “finance” or “business and management consulting.” We’ve all felt it. Frantic chatter about “recruitment” swallows our campus whole, becoming an inescapable topic of conversation and a widespread aspect of identity on campus.
The Ph.D. was once one route among many for the life of the mind — now it is the route. A multiplicity of intellectual paths have over time flattened into one, and that path leads straight through graduate school. But the professionalized academic is not necessarily the best teacher. Here at Dartmouth, we must change our Society of Fellows to align with more diverse intellectual paths. The Society of Fellows should cease to be a postdoctoral program and instead look for a diversity of intellectual backgrounds.
Omar Rashid ’29 lives in Gaza – you can read more about his story from his incoming classmates or through his Instagram. He has risked his life to apply to Dartmouth, and his dream of being accepted came true in December. Yet without help, he may never arrive. Israel has broken the ceasefire, and Gaza has been sealed off from the world. No humanitarian aid has entered Gaza for over a month, and the Israelis allow virtually no one to leave.